<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Would you contribute less to EPF?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mypennysense.com/would-you-contribute-less-to-epf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mypennysense.com/would-you-contribute-less-to-epf</link>
	<description>It's all about the penny and cents</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:06:29 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Penny</title>
		<link>http://www.mypennysense.com/would-you-contribute-less-to-epf/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Penny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 02:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mypennysense.com/?p=154#comment-78</guid>
		<description>Freethinker, in that case, do remember to inform your employer that you&#039;re not for it because it has just been confirmed that the reduction will happen automatically.

Fat4, yupe, it&#039;s only human to spend what we deem as extra income. It takes a lot of discipline not to be tempted.

Alvin, good point there about how we&#039;re boosting foreign economies through our purchases of branded goods. Didn&#039;t occur to me, perhaps didn&#039;t occur to the government too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Freethinker, in that case, do remember to inform your employer that you&#8217;re not for it because it has just been confirmed that the reduction will happen automatically.</p>
<p>Fat4, yupe, it&#8217;s only human to spend what we deem as extra income. It takes a lot of discipline not to be tempted.</p>
<p>Alvin, good point there about how we&#8217;re boosting foreign economies through our purchases of branded goods. Didn&#8217;t occur to me, perhaps didn&#8217;t occur to the government too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alvin Lim</title>
		<link>http://www.mypennysense.com/would-you-contribute-less-to-epf/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Alvin Lim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 09:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mypennysense.com/?p=154#comment-77</guid>
		<description>This is actually a good move in my opinion. It&#039;s not too big a figure, and not too small. And why do I think it&#039;s a good move? Because it gives you the flexibility to use your money. If you put it in EPF, you can&#039;t take it. But if you have the cash with you, you can easily take it, and invest it somewhere. 

And I really think it&#039;s a good thing to have.

But that&#039;s coming from an investor&#039;s point of view. The problem here is that most Malaysians spend money like water. They don&#039;t really think much when it comes to spending even though the economy situation is obviously in a bad shape (unless they don&#039;t read news and don&#039;t talk to people, else they should know). This WILL indeed boost consumer spending, but there&#039;s no point if at the end of the day, they keep spending and end up have no money to pay the debts.

Furthermore, they spend more on branded stuff - funding other countries and not our own. 

So it really depends on which perspective you&#039;re looking at. If you&#039;re an investor and someone who handles money well, this new ruling allows you to have more cash to invest or control. But if you&#039;re not and if you&#039;re someone who needs others&#039; help in investment, then maybe it&#039;s best not to switch to the new ruling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is actually a good move in my opinion. It&#8217;s not too big a figure, and not too small. And why do I think it&#8217;s a good move? Because it gives you the flexibility to use your money. If you put it in EPF, you can&#8217;t take it. But if you have the cash with you, you can easily take it, and invest it somewhere. </p>
<p>And I really think it&#8217;s a good thing to have.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s coming from an investor&#8217;s point of view. The problem here is that most Malaysians spend money like water. They don&#8217;t really think much when it comes to spending even though the economy situation is obviously in a bad shape (unless they don&#8217;t read news and don&#8217;t talk to people, else they should know). This WILL indeed boost consumer spending, but there&#8217;s no point if at the end of the day, they keep spending and end up have no money to pay the debts.</p>
<p>Furthermore, they spend more on branded stuff &#8211; funding other countries and not our own. </p>
<p>So it really depends on which perspective you&#8217;re looking at. If you&#8217;re an investor and someone who handles money well, this new ruling allows you to have more cash to invest or control. But if you&#8217;re not and if you&#8217;re someone who needs others&#8217; help in investment, then maybe it&#8217;s best not to switch to the new ruling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fat4</title>
		<link>http://www.mypennysense.com/would-you-contribute-less-to-epf/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Fat4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 08:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mypennysense.com/?p=154#comment-76</guid>
		<description>It is a proven method to spur spending. Unfortunately the sad reality of today&#039;s economy is that every disposable sen at consumer&#039;s hand is spent and not saved. So the boost to the economy will be there is everyone chooses to contribute only 8% and may not be as marginal as it seems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a proven method to spur spending. Unfortunately the sad reality of today&#8217;s economy is that every disposable sen at consumer&#8217;s hand is spent and not saved. So the boost to the economy will be there is everyone chooses to contribute only 8% and may not be as marginal as it seems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freethinker</title>
		<link>http://www.mypennysense.com/would-you-contribute-less-to-epf/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Freethinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 02:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mypennysense.com/?p=154#comment-75</guid>
		<description>I am not for it, as i think the sum is too lil to make any difference to the economy and secondly, it&#039;s even more riskier to invest than now...

The worst scenario would be losing pension benefits and losing the investment at the same time</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not for it, as i think the sum is too lil to make any difference to the economy and secondly, it&#8217;s even more riskier to invest than now&#8230;</p>
<p>The worst scenario would be losing pension benefits and losing the investment at the same time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
